On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 11:40 -0700, Bruce Byfield wrote: > However, why don't those who prefer not to have SELinux use Revisor to > make their own custom install disk that excludes it? The problem is that SELinux code invades many core components. It's not a matter of simply picking packages and leaving the SELinux ones out. It's more a matter of recompiling those components (including the kernel) without SELinux parts. However, I've yet to see any real evidence (Mr. McCarty's repeated claim notwithstanding) that those parts are actually taking up cycles if SELinux is disabled.
