On Friday 21 September 2007, William Hooper wrote: >Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> Selinux is another layer of security, it isn't a replacement of any >>> security layers, I see no reason why anyone feels such apparently >>> hostility to this piece of technology. >> >> While I'm not hostile to SELinux, >> I'm also not convinced it actually gives any protection in the real world. >> I've never seen anyone say, "Thank God I was running SELinux, >> or I would have been in a mess". > >Mambo Exploit Blocked by SELinux >http://interactive.linuxjournal.com/article/9176 > Interesting link, which prompted me to run chkrootkit -q here, which output what appears to be a typu on my part: Searching for anomalies in shell history files... Warning: `' is linked to another file If I could find it, I'd kill it, but howinhell does one find that? Thanks William. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) [A computer is] like an Old Testament god, with a lot of rules and no mercy. -- Joseph Campbell
