On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 10:09 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Mike McCarty wrote: > > > >> Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Note that contrary to your claims upstream has adopted it even before > >>> the first 2.6 kernel release and many other distributions are in-fact > >>> adopting it as you have agreed with the example of Debian earlier in > >>> this thread. Popularity doesn't determine the best choices. Otherwise > >>> we would be all running Windows now. > >> > >> > >> You need to keep you attributions straight, Rahul. You are getting > >> confused over who said what. > > > > > > I don't see anyone wrongly attributed. Point out to me explicitly if > > that has happened. > > That's because you're confused and not keeping track. > > I'M the one who has pointed out that other distros have adopted > SELinux, not Ralph. You are conflating the messages Ralf and I > have sent. Ralf has consistently stated that other distros > have not adopted SELinux. Let me put it this way: To my knowledge, there is no other distro around but Fedora which has been shipped with SELinux, so far, nor am I aware about any other OS which has it. It would be news to me if Debian should have adopted it. Ralf
