Around 03:56pm on Friday, September 21, 2007 (UK time), Mike McCarty scrawled: > To put it another way: Where is the vast audience of Linux > users who have been clamoring for improvements to security > like those provided by SELinux? > > There is an audience of Linux users who are requesting that > it be removed. Well there are some in this thread that appear to support it. I am "SELinux agnostic" and currently disable it. But discussions that took place on an earlier thread have made me decide to leave it enabled, possibly in permissive mode, when I install the next Fedora release. And there are a number of other distros that don't include it, so why not leave the choice of using a distro with it or without it in place - after all, choice is one of the good things about GNU/Linux, isn't it. Steve -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing? 15:59:39 up 7 days, 2:00, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.07
Attachment:
pgphcFVpWBBr2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
