Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
From: Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:15:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <46E8D429.4080906@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <13e802630709122157t595bf117w5ae847a9090f1a9e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E8D429.4080906@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719)

Andy Green wrote:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> 
>> So, is bluetooth supposed to be much slower than USB connection?
> 
> Yeah, it tops out at 2.1Mbps vs USB 480Mbps.

In other words, BlueTooth is like USB, but slower, or like WiFi, but
slower and shorter range.  I still can't figure out why it's popular.

Matt Flaschen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
  - From: Rick Stevens

References:
- is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
  - From: Paul Johnson
- Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
  - From: Andy Green

Prev by Date: Re: Does anyone have maxima working on Fedora Core 6?
Next by Date: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
Previous by thread: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
Next by thread: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]