Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
• From: Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:15:54 -0400
• In-reply-to: <46E8D429.4080906@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <13e802630709122157t595bf117w5ae847a9090f1a9e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46E8D429.4080906@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719)

Andy Green wrote:
> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> 
>> So, is bluetooth supposed to be much slower than USB connection?
> 
> Yeah, it tops out at 2.1Mbps vs USB 480Mbps.

In other words, BlueTooth is like USB, but slower, or like WiFi, but
slower and shorter range.  I still can't figure out why it's popular.

Matt Flaschen

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
    • From: Rick Stevens

• References:
  • is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
    • From: Paul Johnson
  • Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
    • From: Andy Green

• Prev by Date: Re: Does anyone have maxima working on Fedora Core 6?
• Next by Date: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
• Previous by thread: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
• Next by thread: Re: is bluetooth file transfer supposed to be horribly slow?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread