On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 08:58 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > I personally use time.windows.com because it's easy to remember, and I > figure they can afford the bandwidth. (Plus I enjoy the irony, of > course.) It used to be that they were less than a good time source, with frequent very bad errors. I wonder if that's still the case? -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
