anyone a member of g4l-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ? I subscribed and confirmed my subscription,
but my mail bounced anyway (mailman validating my tony.chamberlain@xxxxxxxxx address).
I tried sending mail to the list owner but the same thing happened (the mail bounced). sourceforge.net
must not like having periods in an address, or I don't know what happened.
Can someone contact the list owner on my behalf and see if he can fix it?
His address: g4l-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or frastep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (I assume it is
a he named Fraser). My address is tony.chamberlain@xxxxxxxxx and I have some important g4l questions.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2007 11:00 AM
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 56
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: RPM conflict upgrading from F7 -> F8 via yum
(Itamar Reis Peixoto)
2. Re: Tesserat not available in the repos (David Timms)
3. Evolution printing on A4 despite printer settings
(Anthony Joseph Seward)
4. Re: Tesserat not available in the repos (Paul Smith)
5. Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ? (Globe Trotter)
6. Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ? (Globe Trotter)
7. Re: Updates available, what do they do? (Bo Berglund)
8. Re: RPM conflict upgrading from F7 -> F8 via yum (Robin Bowes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:43:46 -0300
From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RPM conflict upgrading from F7 -> F8 via yum
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <000c01c7f15d$81ef3aa0$fe01a8c0@ispbrasil>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
please check if you have 2 versions of dbus
rpm -qa dbus
if not install the lasted version with rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps
--------------------
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Timms" <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: RPM conflict upgrading from F7 -> F8 via yum
> Robin Bowes wrote:
>> Transaction Check Error:
>> file /etc/dbus-1/session.conf from install of dbus-1.1.2-4.fc8
>> conflicts with file from package dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7
>> file /etc/dbus-1/system.conf from install of dbus-1.1.2-4.fc8
>> conflicts with file from package dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7
>> file /etc/rc.d/init.d/messagebus from install of dbus-1.1.2-4.fc8
>> conflicts with file from package dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7
>> file /usr/share/man/man1/dbus-daemon.1.gz from install of
>> dbus-1.1.2-4.fc8 conflicts with file from package dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7
>> file /lib/libdbus-1.so.3 from install of dbus-libs-1.1.2-4.fc8
>> conflicts with file from package dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7
>>
>> Any ideas how I can overcome this?
> It is possible that some of these have two copies installed {diff arch or
> version}.
> package-cleanup --problems might give some info.
>
> Did you follow the suggestions in
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq for distro upgrades with yum ?
>
> DaveT.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:50:54 +1000
From: David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tesserat not available in the repos
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <46E1654E.1010501@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Paul Smith wrote:
> On 9/7/07, Paul Smith <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Thanks, G?rard, but 'yum search tesseract' returns nothing!
...
> I have tried with other repositories containing tesseract, but again
> yum was unable to detect the presence of tesseract. Any ideas?
Failing info from /etc/yum.conf, /etc/yum.repos.d/ try yum -d 15 list
tesseract will hint at what sites are being connected to etc.
DaveT.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:02:25 -0600
From: Anthony Joseph Seward <anthony.seward@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Evolution printing on A4 despite printer settings
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <1189177345.19842.2.camel@fleuret>
Content-Type: text/plain
When I try to print an e-mail, Evolution insists on printing to A4 sized
paper despite ALL of the printers being set to US Letter sized paper.
Can anyone help?
TIA,
Tony
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:06:32 +0100
From: "Paul Smith" <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tesserat not available in the repos
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<6ade6f6c0709070806l629ff44ei826d18b2d88ca3e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 9/7/07, David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> Thanks, G?rard, but 'yum search tesseract' returns nothing!
> ...
> > I have tried with other repositories containing tesseract, but again
> > yum was unable to detect the presence of tesseract. Any ideas?
> Failing info from /etc/yum.conf, /etc/yum.repos.d/ try yum -d 15 list
> tesseract will hint at what sites are being connected to etc.
Thanks, Dave. Got the following:
# yum -d 15 list tesseract
Plugin "gpgcheck" uses deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE.
Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead.
Loading "gpgcheck" plugin
Loading "kmdl" plugin
Loading "presto" plugin
Running "config" handler for "gpgcheck" plugin
Running "config" handler for "presto" plugin
Repository updates-testing is listed more than once in the configuration
Repository updates is listed more than once in the configuration
Yum Version: 3.2.4
COMMAND: yum -d 15 list tesseract
Installroot: /
Ext Commands:
tesseract
Reading Local RPMDB
Setting up Package Sacks
Running "postreposetup" handler for "presto" plugin
Setting up Presto
Reading Presto metadata in from local files
No drpms available for google
No drpms available for endur's repo
No drpms available for fedora
No drpms available for adobe-linux-i386
No drpms available for updates
No drpms available for freshrpms
No drpms available for remi
No drpms available for extras
No drpms available for release
Excluding Packages from Fedora 7 - i386
Finished
Excluding Packages from Les RPM de remi pour FC7 - i386
Finished
skipping reposetup, pkgsack exists
Matching packages for package list to user args
Matching packages for package list to user args
Error: No matching Packages to list
#
Any ideas?
Paul
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <496693.71841.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
While we are at this, can someone please point me to some C code for
integrating a function numerically? Something that is good?
Many thanks and best wishes,
Trotter
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OT : Approximate / fast math libraries ?
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <546695.40868.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Actually I found a few in the GNU Scientific Library. Does anyone have any
suggestions/recommendations/caution?
Many thanks,
Trotter
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:55:25 +0200
From: Bo Berglund <bo.berglund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Updates available, what do they do?
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <9ss2e3lv5uem72r8cdb588m8vvkei6lacn@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:47:03 +0100, Chris Jones
<jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Hmm, sounds like you where unlucky. Out of interest, what are the
>version numbers of the two kernels you now have, the one that works and
>the one which does not (grub.conf should tell you this).
vmlinuz-2.6.22.4-65.fc7 new kernel, does not work
vmlinuz-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 old working kernel
>One other minor comment.
>
>I don't know why you chose Fedora, and certainly I do not wish to put
>you of using it !, but you should be aware that fedora is a distro that
>changes fast. As you have seen you get a lot of updates...
Well, I selected it since I knew it was maintained by RedHat as their
open offering...
And because there were so many reports that it could not be done in
VPC2007, which I have now disproved sort of.
Bo Berglund
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:57:21 +0100
From: Robin Bowes <robin-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RPM conflict upgrading from F7 -> F8 via yum
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <fbrscg$nb7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> please check if you have 2 versions of dbus
>
> rpm -qa dbus
I do have two versions of dbus - the x86_64 and the i386:
# rpm -qa dbus
dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7.i386
dbus-1.0.2-4.fc7.x86_64
(I've modified the rpm %_query_all_fmt macro to show architecture)
> if not install the lasted version with rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps
You mean, do that before upgrading everything else?
So:
download latest dbus package(s) (x86_64 and i386) from development repo
Force install them
run yum upgrade
?
R.
------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 56
*******************************************
