On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 18:52 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote: > I have heard a thousand words a week about LVM and it never made the > point that it moved /boot close to the near end of a hard drive. I haven't heard about that happening. It's always been my experience that if you used the install routines to prep your drive, that it made the /boot partition the first one. I don't know if that's coincedental, but it would be a good thing for it to deliberately do. Other partitions get shuffled about, though. I don't know the reasoning behind it (if there is any). e.g. If you had created /boot/, /home/, /tmp/, /usr/, /var/, in that order, you might find that at the end of your manual intervention, it actually created the partitions in another order, albeit with /boot/ being the first partition. Of course, thanks to how drives fake their number of heads and cylinders, to accomodate how BIOSs (and IDE?) are still terribly poor at handling large drives, there's still no guarentee that all of the first partition is going to be where the BIOS can access it. > I HATE LVM. Me too, but for other reasons. It's quite painful to try to recover files from it if it screws up. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
