Re: bind/named problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:48:28PM -0500, John Pierce wrote:
> Hello!
> I installed fedora 7 on one of my servers about 3 weeks ago and setup
> the local name server for my local network.  I set this up, originally
> ~3 years ago, because I was seeing some serious latency problems with
> my isp's name servers.  I also do a lot of repair on machines that
> belong to clients and just thought it would be easier to run my own
> nameservers.

I have a similar setup and have my own local zone as well. I am not
seeing this problem. However, in /var/named/chroot/var/named/, files
are owned by root:named and the three directories (data, dynamic, and
slaves) by named:named. Also:

[root@charlesc etc]# ll /var/named/chroot/var/
total 40
drwxr-x--- 5 root  named 4096 2003-03-13 16:22 .
drwxr-x--- 6 root  named 4096 2007-07-26 10:11 ..
drwxr-x--- 5 root  named 4096 2007-07-26 10:11 named
drwxr-x--- 4 root  named 4096 2003-03-13 16:22 run
drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 2003-03-13 16:22 tmp

Have you checked /var/log/messages for error messages?


Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email    / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB

Attachment: pgpEECTaMwGmm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux