At 5:17 PM +0100 8/1/07, Chris Jones wrote: ... >For sure though SL also has sub-point releases, 3.x and 4.x (currently I >am on a 4.5 release), which I think are the equivalents of what you talk >about above. These updates I believe can occur through yum. However, >I've not aware of any problems in this, its always been pretty flawless. >I'm not the sys-admin though, but I never heard him complain (and I >suspect I would have) or noticed any problems as a user. > >maybe SL is better than centos in this regard ? It sounds more like the Sysadmin just sucked it up when that monstrous update to 4.5 came out. -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
