Re: The case against LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:

>> >> I've been using LVM on one computer for some time,
>> >> without any real problems.
>> >>
>> >> However, I've decided that it causes unnecessary complications,
>> >> as some applications do not seem to accept the LVM devices,
>> >> while I don't find any real advantages to compensate.
>> 
>> >> I wonder if that is the general experience?
>> 
>> > Definitely an asset when connected to a SAN.
>> 
>> Why, as a matter of interest?
>> 
> I think it depends more on the uses of the storage than the underlying
> technology, but it helps to have something with enough space to have
> some flexibility. I have a server with ~16Tb of storage that's shared
> amongst research groups in a university dept. Each group has their own
> filesystem, and LVM means that I can allocate space to whichever one
> particularly needs it without predicting up front who that will be.

I guess if I was in that position I would use LVM!
But I'm just a common-or-garden Linux user ...

[Reminds me of the Thurber cartoon with a mad-looking girl saying,
"Thank you God for making me normal".]


-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux