Re: The case against LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The case against LVM
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:41:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <46AF4EB1.1060409@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <f8nieq$s9p$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46AF4EB1.1060409@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716)

Ed Greshko wrote:


I wonder if that is the general experience?


Works fine for me.  I moved to LVM on all my systems and haven't looked back.


Has it improved anything?

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The case against LVM
  - From: Ed Greshko

References:
- The case against LVM
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: The case against LVM
  - From: Ed Greshko

Prev by Date: Solved by Workaround: Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 and USB Storage Devices
Next by Date: Re: F7 Kernel 2.6.22.1-33.fc7 USB stick
Previous by thread: Re: The case against LVM
Next by thread: Re: The case against LVM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux