on 7/8/2007 4:22 AM, Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 20:28 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> I sure wish all the messages printed the .i386 or the .x86_64 on the >> end of the rpm package name so it was more obvious what was >> happening :-). > > Yes, with kernels too. The old "it installed i586 instead of i686" bug > is quite a pain to resolve. The usual rpm -qa kernel query gives no > hint which processor type kernel is installed. You have to dig a little > deeper to work out why your i686 system is wanting to install an i586 > kernel module during some update, and wanting to re-install other > software that's already installed (it wants a different processor > version of the same thing, but doesn't actually say so). uname -m man uname -- David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
