on 7/5/2007 6:14 PM, Tom Poe wrote: > David Boles wrote: >> on 7/5/2007 3:01 PM, Christopher A. Williams wrote: >> >> I did *not* doubt you. ;-) But I will confirm that what you said here does >> work. Fos news videos are no displayed. >> >> Thanks for the tip. >> > We're days into this topic, and, I just have to pipe in, if I may. > Since 2000, we have been subject to news media that repeatedly > apologized for NOT bringing the news to the general public, instead > following the orders of the administration to lie and mislead us. The > effort to figure out how best to gain access to highly suspect video > news put out by sloppy, unethical journalists, confuses me. Why would > anyone want to view CNN, FOX, or the major network broadcasts for video > news that is guaranteed to be censored in the interest of those who want > to continue the lies and deception of what you and I view or hear? > There are just too many other resources to combine that serve our > interests, not someone else. For example, why is there so much emphasis > on corn as biofuel? There are lots of weeds that use less energy to > convert to biofuel. Corn, on the other hand, feeds you and me. If it > is our future biofuel, our food costs skyrocket! Where's the go&^%*((*& > media on this? You guessed it, they're cowtowing to the all powerful > corporations that stand to make a lot of money they might not otherwise, > if the truth of the matter were known. > > Anyway, good luck with trying to view main media's nonsense. > Tom So what you are saying is that you think that The Internet news sites are less reliable than radio news? Or 'regular' local news? Or newspapers? Or 'some-guys' blog'.org? ;-) Myself? I think that the most unreliable news provided today comes from Tony Snow and the White House. But you are correct. This thread has probably gone on almost as long as the weekly "Where are the CD's thread(s) do. -- David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
