Re: More FC6 update woes.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt <mschwendt <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Perhaps this is kde-redhat. And then the mass-updates theory applies.

Or a conflict between the kde-redhat packages and the official FC6 updates. In 
either case, this should be reported to Rex Dieter.

> > Also note that it has only been broken for 2 weeks for those who use
> > updates-testing, the update only went to updates 1 week ago. So those who
> > already had the breakage for 2 weeks deserve it.
> 
> Great attitude. NOT! Updates-testing is overrated. It is not known how
> few users actually have it enabled.

Those who don't have it enabled aren't those who IMHO "deserve" breakage. Those 
who do have updates-testing enabled and don't report the breakage are the ones 
I'm complaining about, they really shouldn't complain about the breakage not 
getting fixed. The same goes for kde-redhat testing and unstable. Now if the 
broken packages have actually been in kde-redhat stable for that long (I don't 
know when 3.5.7 for FC6 went "stable" at kde-redhat), the situation is 
different.

> Just for the record, I do have F7 updates-testing enabled, and I've reported
> breakage in the KDE 3.5.7 packages.

But unfortunately the breakage you reported can't be fixed without entirely 
replacing a package (syncekonnector by libopensync-plugin-synce), which hasn't 
happened yet. See the long discussion over bug #244917 for the hairy details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244917

        Kevin Kofler


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux