Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
• From: Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:05:59 +0200
• References: <467863A7.2090704@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f84880b00706191839g56844b51l589b0d5ef8e2c619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f5b8qq$ktf$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrnf7lp4j.4tl.mcepl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20070622T004436-638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation)

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:47:04 +0000, Kevin Kofler scripst:
> Actually there is. :-)
> http://apt-rpm.org/patches/aptitude-0.3.5.1-apt-rpm.patch

I heard that it is brutally unstable and even my colleague (the author of 
adept for Ubuntu) was not suggesting it because of hard coredumps it 
allegedly produces.

Matej

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
    • From: Kevin Kofler

• References:
  • OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
    • From: Mike McCarty
  • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
    • From: Kam Leo
  • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
    • From: Timothy Murphy
  • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
    • From: Matej Cepl
  • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
    • From: Kevin Kofler

• Prev by Date: Re: package-cleanup --problems
• Next by Date: Re: Bugzilla
• Previous by thread: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
• Next by thread: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread