Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
From: Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:05:59 +0200
References: <467863A7.2090704@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f84880b00706191839g56844b51l589b0d5ef8e2c619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f5b8qq$ktf$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrnf7lp4j.4tl.mcepl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20070622T004436-638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation)

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:47:04 +0000, Kevin Kofler scripst:
> Actually there is. :-)
> http://apt-rpm.org/patches/aptitude-0.3.5.1-apt-rpm.patch

I heard that it is brutally unstable and even my colleague (the author of 
adept for Ubuntu) was not suggesting it because of hard coredumps it 
allegedly produces.

Matej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Kevin Kofler

References:
- OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Mike McCarty
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Kam Leo
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Matej Cepl
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Kevin Kofler

Prev by Date: Re: package-cleanup --problems
Next by Date: Re: Bugzilla
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
Next by thread: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]