Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matej Cepl <mcepl <at> redhat.com> writes:
> Don't want to fight on any side of this perenial religious war, 
> but just to note that package-cleanup --problems (package-cleanup 
> is in yum-utils package) works pretty well for the first issue.  

That's the equivalent of apt-get check (i.e. only fixes existing breakage). It 
won't help when yum is erroring on the update because the update would break a 
dependency, apt-get dist-upgrade will actually offer to remove the broken 
package to allow the upgrade to proceed in such cases. Also note that apt-get 
check will actually offer to _fix_ the breakage, not just list it.

Note that apt won't actually let you do anything other than fixing the breakage 
on a system with broken dependencies, it's built on the invariant that no 
dependency should ever be broken. Fixing will first try to install missing 
packages and/or upgrade the broken packages to newer versions if that fixes the 
breakage, and if it doesn't, it will remove the broken packages.

All your solutions (also the --exclude one) involve lots of manual work whereas 
apt will try to figure out a solution automatically.

        Kevin Kofler


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux