Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:05:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <f84880b00706211038u1b2d1c9bua461ad5b320fa260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <467863A7.2090704@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f84880b00706191839g56844b51l589b0d5ef8e2c619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f5b8qq$ktf$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070621034656.05c7e2a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f84880b00706211038u1b2d1c9bua461ad5b320fa260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)

Kam Leo wrote:


The subject has been covered after every Fedora release. Here are just
two threads:


Thanks for the pointers.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

References:
- OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Mike McCarty
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Kam Leo
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Chris
- Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
  - From: Kam Leo

Prev by Date: Re: MS compatible MUAs [was Re: evolution weirdness]
Next by Date: OT: Anti-OOXML petition
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
Next by thread: Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]