On 6/8/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kam Leo wrote: > You are getting too much into the bureaucracy. This has very little to > do with the release notes which, by the way, has nothing regarding > memory requirements for Live CD usage. If people do not read EULAs > they're no going to bother to read the release notes. As a minimum put > the requirement into the FAQ. Release notes does specify the memory requirements and they are the logical place for it. I don't see any reason to duplicate that information across many places such as the FAQ or torrent sites. EULA's are very different from release notes. If people don't read the release notes there is no guarantee that they will read the FAQ either. Rahul
The Release Notes do not get updated unless very faulty or critical information needs to be modified or included. (I have first hand knowledge with a submitted bug report which impacted F7. F7 Release Notes were frozen in RC2 and nothing short of a critical problem would get it modified.) A bug report may cause this information to be included for F8. It does not help current users. Regardless of where this information is placed, the intent of my original posting was to find out what official source/document provided the Live CD requirements. I, personally have no need for this information, but what I have gotten so far, is a bureaucratic run-around. It would be nice to have an authenticated source disseminate this data.
