From: "Rick Stevens" <rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 17:28 -0700, jdow wrote:From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > jdow wrote: >>>> FreeBSD is supposed to be more secure than Linux. (And based on >> security>> bug reports that "seems" to be the case.) Apple's OS-X is built on>> FreeBSD, an old one to be sure, though. They just released 17 >> patches....>> >> Microsoft has the bankroll to survive the suits. Red Hat doesn't. Be >> careful what you wish for. >> {^_-} >> > There are different levels of liberality. Try this example: > > You buy a car with break lines that are not designed to handle the > pressure surge when you do panic breaking, that is a design flaw. > You do a panic stop and the line breaks.Uh, sticking my oar in, it's "brake lines", not "break lines." And you certainly do NOT want your "brake" lines to "break". That would be, uhm, bad. :-)
The pun was intended. {^_-} I am NOT devoid of a sense of humor. I am
glad somebody spotted it.
{^v-}
