Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)

• To: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
• From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:32:57 -0500
• Cc: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• In-reply-to: <200705191932.51045.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <64b14b300705150431x6e5f59ebycf243b91e205e4dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200705191917.44943.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070519182134.GA28004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200705191932.51045.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 19:32:50 +0100,
  Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Don't know the book, but do know the man's work, of course.

I am pretty sure I have seen the acronym referred to in some of Larry Niven
and Jerry Pournel's books. Probably "Oath of Fealty".

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
    • From: Ric Moore

• References:
  • Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
    • From: Valent Turkovic
  • Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
    • From: Anne Wilson
  • Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
    • From: G.Wolfe Woodbury
  • Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
    • From: Anne Wilson

• Prev by Date: Re: FC5 and FC6 SELinux policies installed simultaneously
• Next by Date: Re: FC5 and FC6 SELinux policies installed simultaneously
• Previous by thread: Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
• Next by thread: Re: Where Fedora Went Wrong (nice conclusion)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread