Re: SOLVED: unable to launch app due to "cannot open shared object file"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 8:01 PM -0500 5/19/07, Tom Poe wrote:
>Tony Nelson wrote:
>> At 5:02 PM -0700 5/19/07, stan wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 19 May 2007 16:56:56 -0500
>>> Tom Poe <tompoe@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> $ openmovieeditor: error while loading shared libraries:
>>>> libgavl.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
>>>> directory
>>>>
>>>> [1]+  Exit 127                openmovieeditor
>>>>
>>>> I then ran:
>>>> $ locate libgavl.so
>>>> /home/tom/temp/gavl-0.2.5/gavl/.libs/libgavl.so
>>>> /home/tom/temp/gavl-0.2.5/gavl/.libs/libgavl.so.0
>>>> /home/tom/temp/gavl-0.2.5/gavl/.libs/libgavl.so.0.0.0
>>>> /usr/local/lib/libgavl.so
>>>> /usr/local/lib/libgavl.so.0
>>>> /usr/local/lib/libgavl.so.0.0.0
>>>>
>>>> I then brought up /etc/ld.so.conf and added
>>>> "include /usr/local/lib/", then I ran command: ldconfig
>>>> but no go.  Any solutions?
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>> This might be a long shot, but I'm thinking that it is a dependency
>>> that libgavi.so.0 needs that is causing the problem.  i.e. it is trying
>>> to call another library and it isn't there.  Not sure how you would
>>> verify that, unless it is in the logs somewhere, or you install the
>>> libgavi-devel package so you can then run gdb on the process to find
>>> out where it is failing.
>>>
>>
>> My own guess is that libgavl's home in /usr/local/lib/ is not in the
>> default library search path in /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/.
>> ldconfig -p | grep '/usr/local' will probably be empty.  Google around a
>> bit before making too much of this; I've never done it myself.
>>
>Well, everyone was helpful.  Turned out that when I ran "echo
>LD_LIBRARY_PATH" it was empty.  I added /usr/local/lib by typing (I
>think):  ]$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib and then:
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
>That should do it, at least until I have to shut down and boot up again.  :)
>Tom

Google on "linux library search path" to find out why LD_LIBRARY_PATH isn't
such a good idea.
-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux