Tim wrote: > Timothy Murphy: >>> but are stricly legal (or legalistic) sites >>> not allowed to tell us where to find non-free RPMs? >>> Would that be breaking the law? > > Michael Schwendt: >> Yes, it is called "contributory infringement", but IANAL. > > Makes one wonder whether simply saying "more codecs may be downloadable > from the player or supporting websites," and listing address(es), > without actually saying anything about any particular ones, avoids the > issue enough. Ask a lawyer, they'll 99% likely say no. :) -- Rex
