Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
• From: Strong <strong_yethumble@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:38:21 +0700
• In-reply-to: <200704182351.39586.jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <200704182234.59257.jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <13233072.16081176931995611.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20070418T234812-96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200704182351.39586.jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:51:39 +0100 Chris Jones
<jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > CentOS or Scientific Linux give you essentially the same packages
> > without the support contract (and thus also without the cost
> > associated with it). 

It seems its repos are very poor. At least comparing to Fedora's. May I
will change for CentOS but this prevents me from doing so...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
    • From: Akemi Yagi

• References:
  • Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
    • From: Chris Jones
  • Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
    • From: Travis Bullock
  • Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
    • From: Kevin Kofler
  • Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
    • From: Chris Jones

• Prev by Date: Re: confirm 470f040a679d95bbf7abd9ab401adf262f33cea7
• Next by Date: slow login to ssh trough nat to server
• Previous by thread: Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
• Next by thread: Re: FC2 to 5 upgrade
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread