Re: Why is Fedora a multimedia disaster? - Here is why.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You know, I've been wondering why Red Hat hasn't tried to pay royalty for media codecs.  I'm pretty sure they have enough money for it...

Or mabye there are legal issues with including patented technology with Linux/GNU software?

On 4/27/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ric Moore wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel better?
>>>>> Hurray! I for one will be glad to see the back of it.
>>>> How about Noatun?? Can that one be sent to the Bad Place?
>>> Yep, ditto for noatun.  :)
>> I hope xmms doesn't fit in the same fate as those two.
>
> XMMS rocks, I'd say without hesitation to keep that one! Ric

Maybe, except that it lacks mp3 capability in the FCx versions.

By the way, there is nothing illegal, immoral, or even fattening about
the nvidia module RPM's maintained at http://rpm.livna.org/.  Everyone
should know about them.  And if you happen to find some other things
there that fedora doesn't include after you've added the repository to
yum, you didn't hear about that from me.

--
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux