What gets me about threads like this one is the unvoiced assumption that every distribution has to be aimed at the entire potential user base. One of the best things about Linux is having choices. A distribution designed as a corporate desktop system is probably safe is assuming that the person changing the software packages on a system is going to make fairly intelligent decisions on what to remove based on the type of messages yum gives now. In this setting, the end user is not usually going to be the one making the changes. The IT department will. (Probably on batches of systems at one time.) Fedora Core appears to be aimed at another class of users. It seams to be aimed at a more technically knowable group of users. Because of this, it is also possible to "shoot yourself in the foot" if you don't read the information presented to you. You are expected to make informed decisions. That is one reason I am using it. My personal feelings are that FC would be a poor choice for your average home user, especially one that is migrating from an older version of Windows. (98) Depending on their hardware, they may not have enough of a system to affectively run it, and it is not as "User Friendly" for new users as some of the other distributions. If they have the hardware for it, then Ubuntu may be a better choice. (It wouldn't be my choice, but that is the point...) If they do not have the hardware for Ubuntu, then it would be time to look into one of the "less demanding" distributions. (I am not current on this - would they need someone to install/support this?) So maybe what is really needed is a clearer indication of who each distribution is aimed at? As well as a clearer explanation that Linux distributions are not intended to be "One size fits all"... Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
