Yeah bind doesn't link double zones, glad to help kick start the brain. Jason ..·><((((º> > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob > Goodwin - W2BOD > Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 3:44 PM > To: For users of Fedora > Subject: Re: Nameserver Problem Revisited - > > > Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > > Anything in the log files? > > > > Jason > > ..·><((((º> > > > > > Yes as it turns out, thanks for asking. > > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: starting BIND 9.3.4 -u named -t > /var/named/chroot > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: found 2 CPUs, using 2 worker threads > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: loading configuration from > '/etc/named.conf' > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: /etc/blocking.conf:29: zone > 'ad.doubleclick.net': already exists previous definition: > /etc/blocking.conf:15 > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: listening on IPv6 interface > lo, ::1#53 > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, > 127.0.0.1#53 > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: /etc/blocking.conf:29: zone > 'ad.doubleclick.net' already exists > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: loading configuration: > already exists > Apr 7 15:22:39 box6 named[5097]: exiting (due to fatal error) > > I removed the double entry from > /var/named/chroot/etc/blocking.conf and > then I was able to start named! > > I added some entries to the blocking file late yesterday and > I obviously > screwed things up, I never would have guessed entering the same URL > twice would do that? > > Thanks for the help. > > Bob Goodwin > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob > >> Goodwin - W2BOD > >> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 3:26 PM > >> To: For users of Fedora > >> Subject: Re: Nameserver Problem Revisited - > >> > >> > >> Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote: > >> > >>> Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote: > >>> > >>>> Tim wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:42 -0400, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> This scheme worked nicely until this morning! > >>>>>> > >> service named status > >> rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused > >> > >> > >> service named restart > >> Stopping named: [FAILED] > >> Starting named: [FAILED] > >> > >> Can anyone tell me what might be wrong here? Everything > worked well > >> until this morning. > >> > >> I can't imagine that I have done anything to cause a problem? > >> > >> Bob Goodwin > >> > >> > >> -- > >> fedora-list mailing list > >> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >