On Sunday 01 April 2007 11:37:51 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Todd Zullinger wrote: > > One downside of just grabbing the boot.iso and installing is that > > there is no signature for that file (or the others in the images/ dir > > of the Fedora os tree. I asked about this on the devel list last week > > but didn't get much in the way of replies. > > With the merge of core and extras, the traffic on fedora-devel is a bit > insane. Guess that's just the pain of growing up. Finding a good > subject is essential. I just looked up your post and it wasn't > particularly clear to me. If you don't attention in the first post might > as well as try again after a few days or file a report if that's a > (potential" bug. Bug reports get assigned to specific folks and ignoring > them is harder. > > > It seems to me that starting the OS install from a bootable file that > > cannot be easily verified[1] is a problem that shouldn't exist. All > > of the packages Fedora pushes are gpg signed, as are the full .iso > > images. I've not looked at the anaconda source to see if gpg checking > > is enabled during installation, but I would think (hope) that it would > > (should) be. > > > > Do you see this as a problem Rahul? I think it is and would like to > > see it corrected but I'm not sure where to take it. I may end up > > opening a bug about it some afternoon, just so it doesn't go away > > (assuming there isn't one opened already). > > Yep, that's a issue. File a bug report against the "distribution" > component. Jesse Keating or Bill Nottingham should be looking into that. > > Rahul Hi List; Is FC7, Test 3 available with a KDE desktop? I've read some talk about KDE going away, KDE moving to a separate Install DVD, etc.. Not sure what the real status/direction is for KDE. plus I'd like to test FC7. Thanks in advance for any help/direction.
