Re: Glxgears on ATI rage Pro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 05:16 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:01 -0700, Les wrote:
> > Hi, everyone, the ongoing battle of the graphics cards.  My "good" read
> > high speed full development system runs well.  However I want to use an
> > older system with Croquet.  Problem: the older system appears
> > misconficured somehow.
> > It has an ATI Rage Pro graphics chip set according to lspci,  And the
> > graphics configuration for X sets it up as a Rage board OK.  I have
> > attempted to down load the latest ATI driver for it, but unsuccessfully,
> > so I suspect I will have to attempt that late tonight when there is less
> > traffic.  In the mean time, I am working to discover what I can about
> > the current setup that is bad.  I went throght the configuration on
> > Finley's site, and it appeared to work OK, then when I rebooted, it
> > began to reconfigure the graphics on every reboot.  And I still have low
> > performance, and moreover seem to have lost a bit of software from the
> > graphics interface.  Here is the output from glxgears:
> > [lesh@localhost ~]$ glxgears
> > Xlib:  extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
> > 541 frames in 6.1 seconds = 89.342 FPS
> > 452 frames in 5.6 seconds = 80.584 FPS
> [snip]
> > Does anyone have any idea of what I should try next? Or where I could
> > look for debugging this program?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Les H
> 
> Sadly enough, there's no easy solution for your problem.
> For the time being I'm forced to download/patch/build/install the DRI
> drivers (and the mesa RPM) for my mach64 based laptop display by hand.
> On the upside, the next kernel - libDRI sync will most likely include
> the latest mach64/rage/rage128 drivers paving the pay to a
> out-of-the-box experience.
> 
> In the mean time, if you're willing to put an effort into it, do the
> following:
> A. Download the latest rage128 snapshot from freedesktop [1]. You'll
> need to patch it to make it compatible withe latest kernel. (Let me know
> if you need help.)
> B. Build and install the rage128 DRI kernel module using the build-in
> install.sh script.
> C. As far as I remember, the mesa RPM already includes the user-land
> rage128 DRI driver, so there's no need to patch and rebuild the mesa
> SRPM. (One of my least favorite tasks :()
> 
> - Gilboa
> [1] http://dri.freedesktop.org/snapshots/

Strike that.
Oops... you don't have a rage128, you have a rage-pro chipset - which
AFAIR, is more-or-less the same as my mach64/rage-LT chipset. (Am I
right?)
If so, do the following:
A. Download the latest mach64 snapshot from freedesktop [1]. You'll need
to patch it to make it compatible withe latest kernel. (Let me know if
you need help.)
B. Build and install the mach64 DRI kernel module using the build-in install.sh script.
C. Make sure you have a working SRPM build environment. [2]
D. Download and install the latest mesa SRPM from Fedora. [3]
E. Apply the attached patch to the mesa.spec file. [4] (cd ~/redhat/SPEC; patch -p0 < /patch/file/path/mesa.patch)
F. Build and install the hand-build mesa SRPM. (rpmbuild -ba mesa.spec)

Be aware the mach64 DRI is a bit, err, sketchy, it should be enough to run a composite manager 
(xcompmgr/kompmgr) and a nice OpenGL screen saver - but it's not iron proof.
(Read: I never tried running compiz/beryl on it, and I had a few crashes)

- Gilboa
[1] http://dri.freedesktop.org/snapshots/
[2] http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/building_RPMS_from_SRPMS.html
[3]
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/6/SRPMS/
[4] mesa.patch follows:
==== BEGIN patch =======
--- mesa.spec.old       2007-02-26 12:45:09.000000000 +0200
+++ mesa.spec   2007-02-26 12:47:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 Summary: Mesa graphics libraries
 Name: mesa
 Version: 6.5.1
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 License: MIT/X11
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 URL: http://www.mesa3d.org
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@

 %if %{with_dri}
 install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/dri
-for f in i810 i915 i965 mga r128 r200 r300 radeon savage sis tdfx
unichrome; do
+for f in i810 i915 i965 mga r128 r200 r300 radeon savage sis tdfx
unichrome mach64; do
     so=%{_lib}/${f}_dri.so
     test -e $so && install -m 0755 $so  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/dri
 done
@@ -419,6 +419,9 @@
 %{_bindir}/glxinfo

 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 26 2007 Gilboa Davara <gilboad [AT] gmail.com> 6.5.1-10.fc6
+- Mach64 support.
+
 * Wed Jan 24 2007 Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> 6.5.1-9.fc6
 - Add a build (and hopefully runtime) fix for mach64.  (#221117)
====  END patch   =======



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux