Michael A Peters wrote: > I thought legacy was now defunct? Yes, legacy is defunct. But installing whatever updates are available is better than not installing them... > btw - if legacy is dead, it would be nice to not lose FC updates until > two months old and a couple months, even if the only updates pushed are > security fixes. Do you mean "two years old and a couple of months"? You probably want RHEL or Centos. Do you mean two releases and a couple of months? The plan, I understand, is that FC5 will be supported until a month after F7 is released, which should be close enough... > For "utility" type boxes, the latest FC is really not necessary except > when no more updates are pushed, and upgrading those boxes can be time > consuming, so sometimes I like to wait until a release is a month old > and bad things have been discovered and fixed. I bet I'm not the only > one. Knowing there will be security fixes for two versions old would be > a comfort while waiting, especially since purpose of these boxes is to > have open ports. Seriously, that's the sort of use for which RHEL or CentOS is suited -- set it up, set up updates, and forget it. James. -- E-mail: james@ | I learnt the rules of rugby. There is only one rule. aprilcottage.co.uk | "Skip it by any means necessary". | -- "Nix"