On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 18:29:32 PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik (mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Five-seven years ago, rpm was, hands down, the technically superior package > management system. But it failed to keep up with the times. Rather than > fixing fundamental defects in rpm which fundamental defects, sorry? Marco -- The right way to make everybody love Free Standards and Free Software: http://digifreedom.net/node/73
