Craig White wrote:
Come to think of it, I don't recall ever seeing savvy administrators whining over a new scripting challenge, especially something that is this easy.
It wasn't meant as a whine in the sense that it can't be done or
that I had to do it, but more a complaint of having to do it *because*
of someone else's decision to implement that limitation. I'm being
forced to do one of two things: either rotate logs more often and write
a wrapper around the rotation, or rebuild syslog (and whatever other
utility needed to make this work.) Neither of which are necessary if
that limit wasn't implemented. Again, I don't see any reason why it
still exists.
--
W | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@xxxxxxxxxx> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / Websmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Imaging . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
