Re: clamav-0.90

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: clamav-0.90
From: Dario Lesca <d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:23:42 +0100
In-reply-to: <20070219140946.GC623@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1171637656.4833.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0a3301c75226$44d6c830$0225a8c0@wednesday> <20070219093114.GF11705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1171885686.3701.145.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070219140946.GC623@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Il giorno lun, 19/02/2007 alle 15.09 +0100, Axel Thimm ha scritto:

> I'm not sure what you mean. I don't think that livna has clamav,
Ooopss!
I'm sorry :-( ... I have confused Livna with ATrpms.

-- 
Dario Lesca <d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- clamav-0.90
  - From: Dario Lesca
- Re: clamav-0.90
  - From: jdow
- Re: clamav-0.90
  - From: Axel Thimm
- Re: clamav-0.90
  - From: Dario Lesca
- Re: clamav-0.90
  - From: Axel Thimm

Prev by Date: Re: Kaffiene question re audio
Next by Date: Re: How should I file RFEs on RH's Bugzilla?
Previous by thread: Re: clamav-0.90
Next by thread: Re: clamav-0.90
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]