-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 18 January 2007 12:04, Ric Moore wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:12 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: >>> You are absolutely right about the applications being compiled for >>> libselinux. I tested this the hard way by ripping it out with rpm -ev >>> --nodeps. Basically it hosed the system; the box would not even boot >>> anymore. Kernel panic reared it's head early on in the boot process. >> You're a good man Lyvim, thank you for giving it a go, now the rest of >> us learned by your experience! :) Ric > > Yes, please add my thanks to the chorus too. How long have you paranoid SELinux bashers been using Fedora Core? SELinux has been in Fedora Core at least since FC-3 and I think that I remember it in FC-2. So whatever it is that you don't want the world to see it could have already seen. ;-) Google is your friend. If any of you would have spent a small part of the time researching what SELinux really does and why it does it, as you have bashing it incorrectly for what it does not do, this conversation would have ended long ago. This list has turned into a chat list and seeing this thread has ended for me. 'Plonk'. - -- David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFFr7tsAO0wNI1X4QERArqLAJwOPG/uN3Vvn/eLtfrLz+/aqpiAsQCgjzhU fj9ERcz1KmkTgO3LloI3hEQ= =qNSD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
