> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:54:10PM -0500, aragonx@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I was indeed referring to the change in the date of the time change in >> the >> USA. Wow, what a confusing sentence. I should probably reword that... > > Tue Sep 06 2005 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> 2005m-2 > > - 2005m > - changes for USA (extending DST by 4 weeks since 2007), Tunisia, > Australia, Kazakhstan > - historical timezone data changes for Japan, Poland, Northern Ireland > and > Mali > - timezone name change for East Timor That answered my question quite well. Thank you very much. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.