Re: Redhat vs. Oracle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Redhat vs. Oracle
From: Paul Osunero <esiex3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:47:44 -0600
In-reply-to: <20070104182305.3e3938ff@zooty>
References: <459D4603.2060205@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070104182305.3e3938ff@zooty>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219)

Tom Horsley wrote:

Ah, but Oracle offering their own distribution and support will
be a good thing. Why with Oracle's resources they will be
able to close bugs with the status "upstream" in mere days
instead of the weeks it takes Redhat :-).

http://www.linuxformat.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=433

So what are the benefits of going with Oracle Enterprise Linux? At the moment, considering the weirdness we've had already with the bootloader screen, the applications menu and the Mozilla disappearing act, we'd strongly recommend waiting a few months to let Oracle iron out these bugs.

Redhat's not that bad with bugs anyway, not in my experience at least...

References:
- Redhat vs. Oracle
  - From: jim tate
- Re: Redhat vs. Oracle
  - From: Tom Horsley

Prev by Date: a problem with evolution
Next by Date: Re: Source for Fedora kernels
Previous by thread: Re: Redhat vs. Oracle
Next by thread: Re: Redhat vs. Oracle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux