Tim wrote: >> I'd go along with that. I am a native English speaker, and I've found >> word processing grammar checking tools leave a lot to be desired. Some >> of the results, I've seen, give you the impression that a 12 year old >> wrote the document. They might find some glaring errors, but more >> subtle ones go un-noticed. Mike McCarty: > I think you have unreasonable expectations. I don't agree. I don't really expect them to be able to do any better than they do. Human language is a rather complex thing, with some quite large regional variations. But computer programmers like to try and reduce things down to the lowest common denominator. The two are opposite goals. -- (Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
