On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 11:40 -1000, Donald Tripp wrote: > I concur. I use FC for my desktop / laptop, and Scientific Linux > (another RHAS rebuild) for our cluster and servers. For high > performance computing you are not concerned with the latest greatest > version of xwindows or grub, but more concerned with stability. RHAS > rebuild projects give us that stability ( I'm still running > 2.6.9-34EL ). But for my desktop where I am tweaking this, compile > test programs, evaluating software for other users, its good to be on > the bleeding edge, even if sometimes you get cut... :-) I agree with you and your assessment 100%, Donald. The whole deal with Fedora, as noted in the beginning, that it is a hot test bed for RHEL and it will be cyclical, ever evolving at the bleeding edge. No where does the intro to Fedora say that it is a good server candidate. As I posted before, from what I perceive that I read, FC6 is supposed to be the last edition in that devel cycle and FC7, or whatever they call it, should be settled down and hopefully remain that way for a much longer period of time. It might even be a server candidate, I dunno. I understand that they haven't gone to all the expense to support Fedora for us for our pure bumpin' enjoyment, but maybe Rahul will drop it on us and put all of the speculation to rest. That would be a good thing. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================
