Cameron Simpson wrote: > My hate is well channelled. :-) > configure should be setting PKG_CONFIG_PATH when running pkgconfig, > as a consequence of telling configure the --prefix. It's on par with > the silly CFLAGS and LDFLAGS fiddling I have to do. For the very > normal values I'm supplying, configure should be doing it. Fair enough, that does sound like a reasonable thing to expect. I'm not up enough of the autotools to know if that's something that just hasn't made it in yet or if it's been debated and purposefully left out. > | I filed an RFE to update libgpod to something newer[1]. I'm > | hopeful that once 0.4.1 is released that will happen, which > | shouldn't be too long. > | [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211648 > > Ta. Have tried to subscribe ("Add CC") but bugzilla blew up at me:-( Maybe bugzilla heard you talking nasty about it's pal configure? ;) If you want me to try adding you to the bug I can, but I wouldn't want to do that without checking to see if you want the same address used for that as you use here. But if it'd help out, I'll try. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ====================================================================== Always do right -- this will gratify some and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain (1835-1910)
Attachment:
pgpmeG54yQRHr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
