Tom, he's using a supernet/CIDR block/classless (or whatever you want to call it) addressing, his valid range would be from 192.168.128.1 through 192.168.135.254 so yes his gateway exists on his network. -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Timothy Murphy Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 7:51 AM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: FC6 and Network Ferguson, Michael wrote: > Route -n returns > > Kernal IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmase Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.248.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.131.21 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 I can't really contribute to the discussion, but as a matter of interest, why do you have such a strange setup? What is eth0 (wireless or ethernet)? And what exactly is it connected to? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
