Jeffrey, Thanks. Strange though is that I am running 2 other Linux boxes here RHES 3 and 4 just fine. I will run the arp and post it. Thanks much -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Ross Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:03 PM To: For users of Fedora Subject: Re: FC6 and Network Tom Rivers wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 12:18 -0500, Ferguson, Michael wrote: > >> Andy, >> Thanks. >> >> Route -n returns >> >> Kernal IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmase Flags Metric Ref Use Iface >> 192.168.128.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.248.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 >> 0.0.0.0 192.168.131.21 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 >> >> 'preciate it. >> > > Hi Michael, > > Unless I'm missing something here, there is a mismatch in IP ranges. > Your first line references 192.168.128.0/255.255.255.248, yet the > default gateway is 192.168.131.21 which I don't think responds to a > 192.168.128.0/255.255.255.0 network. You may want to check your IP > address for eth0, "ifconfig eth0", and make sure it's on the same > class C network range that your default gateway is. This kind of > problem would account for the "Destination unreachable" messages. > > > Tom > > Tom, he's using a supernet/CIDR block/classless (or whatever you want to call it) addressing, his valid range would be from 192.168.128.1 through 192.168.135.254 so yes his gateway exists on his network. Michael, I've never tried using this type of addressing with Linux, assuming it does in fact work, I would be interested in seeing what the output of "/sbin/ifconfig eth0" is and if anything shows up in the arp table "/sbin/arp -a" what its output is. could you post the output of those? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
