Re: weird routing question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Green wrote:
fedora wrote:

10.XX.70.0   0.0.0.0    255.255.255.0     U       0       0      0  eth1

*/# route del -net 10.XX.70.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.XX.70.1 eth1

You don't need the gateway stuff, it is not on the line you want to delete. Without the gateway part it should work.

SIOCDELRT: No such process/*

Can anyone help me understand what I am doing wrong on the route del command and also if it looks like I am moving in the right direction to remove the latency issue?

Latencies are very often DNS problems of some sort. Check the /etc/resolv.conf nameservers, and do a dig on them by hand from the box in question

dig google.com @ my.first.nameserver.ip

and see what the latencies are like.  If the latencies are good, try a

tcpdump -i eth1 port 53 -s0 -X

and try to cause the delay, maybe you can get a clue.

-Andy

Interesting - when I run tcpdump and try to connect on port 143 (IMAP port) it shows the immediate connection to that specific port - in other words, no latency on the server end - it appears to be on the way back to the desktop to complete the connection that the latency comes into play. Here's what is interesting - when I kill the tcpdump it shows the following:
392 packets received by filter
299 packets dropped by kernel
I only ran this for approximately 30 seconds on our live system and only about three or four users' computers connected during this session. Your thoughts - anyone.
Doug


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux