Re: Should RPM check its database?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should RPM check its database?
From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:35:58 -0600
In-reply-to: <p04330101c183f88af4c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <p04330101c183f88af4c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/17/06, Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Should RPM check its database periodically?  (Currently I don't believe it

...

While I'm at it, should Anaconda check the RPM database before doing an
upgrade, and offer to repair the database if there is a problem and the
Packages file is OK?


I vote yes, or at least offer the option.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA

Prev by Date: Re: X and Intel 965
Next by Date: Re: Flash
Previous by thread: Re: Should RPM check its database?
Next by thread: Java plugin and 64bit Firefox
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]