The groklaw article is the very same day after knee jerk reaction that is
pointed out in the linux-watch article. I was ready to dump any relation
and use of SuSE the day I heard it. After some more reading and calm
thought, it now appears to me a very different situation than first thought.
The jury is still out though...
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig White" <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Novell Is Not SCO
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:59 -0500, taharka wrote:
How do,
Novell is not SCO
Publication:LinuxWatch
Date:Nov 09 2006
Reporter:Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Novell is not SCO. Novell is not the great anti-GPL. Get over it. I'm
getting a little tired of the constant Novell-bashing. Do I think that
Novell made a smart long term move by partnering up with Microsoft? No,
I don't.
Full article at;
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4287912423.html
Note, there is an area for feedback/comments at the above link ;-)
----
for a completely different perspective...
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061102175508403
Craig
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
