On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 15:28 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > However, it turns out that even a $70 dollar webcam is, photographicly > speaking, a POS. Color is basicly way off, with no chance of software > corrections as the error is in gamma tracking from color to color I'm not surprised. That's still damn cheap. And webcams are generally designed to manage to get some sort of picture in bad lighting, rather than be very good. Most are sensitive to IR and UV, so that throws colour really out of whack, too. -- (Currently running FC4, also trying FC5.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
