Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
• From: Kim Lux <lux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 11:38:49 -0700
• In-reply-to: <1162664571.4497.322.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <454AB0A0.9070809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1162618285.4497.289.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4fa5e2e40611040052w3644e0a6he458a81a93691560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1162664571.4497.322.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I had the same question this week.

nvu looks good.  It appears to be repackaged with a bunch of fixes as
kompozer.  

I'm wondering what happened to Quantum Plus.  I used it once and it
wasn't WYSIWYG and I hated. it.  nvu is WYSIWYG.   Is Quantum Plus
WYSIWYG now ?

-- 
Kim Lux,  Diesel Research Inc.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
    • From: magicus
  • Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
    • From: Stu@ Murray-Smith

• References:
  • Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
    • From: David G. Miller
  • Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
    • From: Ric Moore
  • Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
    • From: Oliver Leitner
  • Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
    • From: Ric Moore

• Prev by Date: Re: Is KDE on Fedora really that bad?
• Next by Date: Re: OT: Interesting news - what does this mean for RH?
• Previous by thread: Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
• Next by thread: Re: What is everyone using for a webpage editor ???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread