On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 09:22 -0700, Kim Lux wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:04 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Arthur Pemberton <pemboa <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > I just have to ask. I was reading through an article on slashdot.org, > > > and I found a suprising number of comments which amounted to "KDE on > > > RedHat is bad". As somone who has never tried anything but Fedora, but > > > love KDE, I need to know...am I getting a raw deal without knowing it? > > > > I'm using the Fedora-provided KDE, I don't see what the problems with it are > > supposed to be. It works great for me. > > > > Ditto. It works really great for me. Like I can't imagine how to make > it much better, but I am sure the KDE folk will nonetheless. Its pretty > awesome. > > I while back I opened a gnome session. I don't see what all the fuss is > about. I thought it was clearly inferior. Maybe its just me. > > I guess the good thing is that we have a choice ! I don't like Redhat, > especially Fedora, favoring one over the other. > > -- > Kim Lux, Diesel Research Inc. > > Note: I'm a KDE user since... KDE 1? RedHat is a business and its main market is the enterprise market. Like it or not, from the business user stand point, GNOME -is- superior. OpenOffice is (at least for now) better suited to be an Office 2K3 replacement. Evolution is (by far) better suited to be a Outlook replacement. Clearlook is much better for the unsuspecting eyes and the GNOME interface is much cleaner. So why do I use KDE? Eye-candy, choice, konsole, konq file management, kate, kpdf and having the ability to seamlessly integrate evolution, OpenOffice and (g)vim into it... - Gilboa
