Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:13:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <4535C096.70500@xxxxxxxx>
References: <45357EF8.7000808@xxxxxxxx> <20061018015147.GD11019@xxxxxxxxxx> <4535C096.70500@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061008)

Jim Garrison schrieb:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>[...]
> 3) Build and install the most recent e1000 driver
>    from Intel's website -- the one included in FC5
>    apparently does not work with the ethernet chip
>    on this motherboard.

The latest 2.6.18-kernel shipped as update for FC5 two days ago and
included in FC6 will probably support the network chip on your
motherboard, too.

CU
thl

References:
- DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
  - From: Jim Garrison
- Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
  - From: Dave Jones
- Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
  - From: Jim Garrison

Prev by Date: Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
Next by Date: read/write access for non-root user on usb drive
Previous by thread: Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
Next by thread: Re: DG965 and FC5 NO GO - How about 945 chipset?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]