On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:36:14PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: > Also, can anyone explain the ".fc5" rather than "_FC5" in the name of > the latest kernel? Do you suppose this one wasn't really intended for > general release? It's now using the %{dist} tag in the specfile instead of a hardcoded _FC5 Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk