Re: smart package mgr question?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:12:07AM -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> Good points. It's the reason I almost never accept downgrades 
> suggested by Smart, except when I'm trying to get around some 
> dependency issue, and intend to reinstall the current packages 
> immediately after - I have done it on one or two other occasions, 
> but for very special circumstances. As I mentioned earlier in 
> this thread, Smart always gives you an approval window where it 
> lists exactly what it intends to do before proceeding, and 
> there's a cancel button. 

Claude, for a meaningful discussion on this subject you should post
what exactly smart is trying to do, best with --explain. Otherwise
we're hunting myths and noone is served by this, it just creates
hearsay arguments that some people like the software and others
don't. W/o details it cannot be analysed.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp947HsJuoSX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux